University of California, Riverside
College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences
UCR Citrus Variety Collection - Home
UCR Home UCR Web Sites
Search
Resources



Reed Marsh grapefruit

Citrus paradisi Macfadyen

CRC 3128

PI 539471

VI 142  

REEDREED

REEDREED

Photos by Toni Siebert, CVC, 5/22/2008. Photo rights. C-35 left, Carrizo right, 25 year old trees.

  

Source: Received as budwood from J.F. Reed, Taft, Ca, 1958.

 

Parentage/origins: J.F. Reed bought fruit from the grocery store and planted the seeds.

 

Rootstocks of accession: Carrizo citrange, C-35 citrange

 

Season of ripeness at Riverside: January to May

 

Notes and observations:

WPB: Trees thorny, few seeds, excellent quality and taste- larger than any other grapefruit in this area.

3/18/1988, EMN: Fruit examined. This is a typical Marsh; appears identical to CRC 3184 & 3804.

 

Description from The Citrus Industry Vol. 1 (1967):

" Fruit medium in size, oblate to spherical; areole ring indistinct or lacking; seeds few or none.  Color pale to light yellow at maturity.  Rind medium-thin, tough; surface very smooth and even.  Flesh buff-colored; tender, very juicy; flavor good though not so pronounced as in some seedy varieties.  Holds unusually well on the tree and ships and stores well.  The latest-maturing of all commercial varieties.
      Tree vigorous, spreading, large, and productive.  Because of high heat requirements, commercially restricted to very hot climates.
      According to Webber (1943), Marsh apparently originated as a chance seedling planted about 1860 on a farm near Lakeland, Florida.  Its commercial value as a seedless variety was not recognized until 1886, however, when it was brought to the attention of E. H. Tison of the Lakeland Nursery Company, who immediately arranged for its propagation and introduced it soon thereafter as a choice seedless variety.  A few years later it was given its present name by C. M. Marsh, who had acquired the Lakeland Nursery.  According to Mr. Tison, the owner of the farm on which the parent tree occurred insisted that it developed as a root sprout from an old seedling tree which produced seedy fruit.  While this is possible, it seems highly improbable.
      Primarily because of its comparative seedlessness, within a few years after its introduction Marsh became the variety most planted in Florida and virtually the only variety planted elsewhere.  It is still by far the leading variety and is worldwide in its distribution.
      Marsh is of unusual horticultural interest not only because it was the first seedless grapefruit variety discovered but also because the pigmented varieties currently of greatest commercial importance trace back to it.  Thus, Thompson (Pink Marsh) originated as a limb sport of Marsh and Redblush (Ruby) or Red Marsh occurred as a bud mutation of Thompson.  On the other hand, Marsh has also given rise to inferior bud variations, frequently characterized by a reversion to seediness.
      Other seedless varieties of more recent origin, virtually indistinguishable from Marsh, include Cecily of South Africa and Davis.
      Nucellar clonal budlines are currently of importance in Texas, Arizona and California, principal among which are Frost, CES (Citrus Experiment Station, Riverside, California), and USDA (U.S. Date and Citrus Station, Indio, California).  Reed, a seedling that originated in the dooryard of J. F. Reed of Taft, California, is one of the most recent selections to receive attention."

 

Availability: Commercially available in California through the Citrus Clonal Protection Program.

 

USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network page for Reed Marsh Grapefruit

 

Bibliography:

Citrograph 60: 258-261, May 1975.

CVC Fruit Quality Data for Reed Marsh Grapefruit:

(Old format)

 

CULTIVAR SAMPLE LOCATION DATE  NUMBER OF FRUIT PER SAMPLE TOTAL LENGTH PER SAMPLE (cm) TOTAL WIDTH PER SAMPLE (cm) LENGTH /WIDTH RATIO TOTAL WT PER SAMPLE (grams) MEAN WEIGHT PER FRUIT (grams) EXTERNAL COLOR BASED ON COLOR CHART TEXTURE BASED ON CHART TOTAL RIND THICKNESS PER SAMPLE (mm) TOTAL SEEDS PER SAMPLE INTERIOR COLOR DESCRIPTION TOTAL JUICE WT. PER SAMPLE (grams) % JUICE TSS (TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS) % ACID (BASED ON CITRIC ACID) RATIO (TSS / % ACID) 
REED MARSH Riverside 1/8/1997 10 71.8 78.4 0.9 2042.5 204.3 9.5 2.5 66.0 34.0 PALE 986.7 48.3 9.3 1.5 6.4
REED MARSH Riverside 1/8/1997 10 73.7 81.1 0.9 2281.5 228.2 9.5 2.0 69.0 31.0 PALE 1089.2 47.7 10.7 1.5 7.3
REED MARSH Coachella 1/9/1997 10 92.3 98.3 0.9 3889.9 389.0 9.5 2.5 80.0 31.0 PALE 1891.3 48.6 8.3 1.1 7.4
REED MARSH Riverside 1/27/1997 10 79.8 81.7 1.0 2373.1 237.3 10.0 2.0 71.0 36.0 YELLOW 1110.3 46.8 10.4 1.6 6.2
REED MARSH Riverside 1/27/1997 10 73.2 81.4 0.9 2279.4 227.9 10.0 2.0 64.0 31.0 YELLOW 1131.0 49.6 11.2 1.7 6.7
REED MARSH Coachella 2/27/1997 10 101.4 105.7 1.0 5131.3 513.1 9.0 2.5 92.0 19.0 LT. YELLOW 2298.1 44.8 8.2 1.2 7.1
REED MARSH Riverside 1/8/1998 10 86.4 90.2 1.0 3564.3 356.4 8.5 1.5 79.0 29.0 LT. YELLOW 1652.3 46.4 8.9 1.4 6.3
REED MARSH Riverside 1/8/1998 10 88.8 92.2 1.0 3621.0 362.1 8.5 1.5 75.0 42.0 LT. YELLOW 1672.4 46.2 8.7 1.4 6.3
REED MARSH Coachella 1/14/1998 10 99.5 104.3 1.0 4574.0 457.4 9.5 3.0 99.0 26.0 LT. YELLOW 1911.4 41.8 7.7 1.2 6.6
REED MARSH Riverside 1/30/1998 10 90.1 94.2 1.0 3738.4 373.8 9.0 1.5 84.0 30.0 PALE 1761.8 47.1 9.7 1.3 7.6
REED MARSH Riverside 1/30/1998 10 92.5 96.8 1.0 3991.4 399.1 9.0 2.0 78.0 41.0 PALE 1946.0 48.8 10.4 1.4 7.4
REED MARSH Coachella 2/6/1998 10 99.7 105.0 0.9 4643.0 464.3 9.0 2.0 96.0 44.0 LIGHT PINK 1798.7 38.7 7.6 1.1 7.0
REED MARSH Riverside 3/2/1998 10 93.4 103.9 0.9 4421.8 442.2 8.0 1.5 92.0 34.0 PALE YELLOW 2034.0 46.0 9.5 1.2 8.1
REED MARSH Riverside 3/2/1998 10 96.9 102.3 0.9 4417.6 441.8 8.5 1.5 89.0 43.0 PALE YELLOW 2158.9 48.9 10.5 1.2 8.7
REED MARSH Coachella 1/4/1999 10 90.7 103.4 0.9 4391.4 439.1 7.0 1.5 87.0 31.0 MED. YEL. 2072.3 47.2 7.5 1.4 5.4
REED MARSH  Riverside 1/8/1999 10 67.5 76.5 0.9 1841.7 184.2 6.9 2.0 66.0 9.0 BR. YEL. 831.8 45.2 10.2 1.5 6.9
REED MARSH  Riverside 1/8/1999 10 67.5 76.3 0.9 1885.4 188.5 7.5 2.0 55.0 19.0 MED. YEL. 902.1 47.8 11.3 1.8 6.2
REED MARSH Coachella 1/28/1999 10 92.3 106.5 0.9 4606.7 460.7 9.5 1.5 93.5 27.0 PALE YEL. 2124.9 46.1 8.3 1.3 6.3
REED MARSH  Riverside 1/29/1999 10 71.6 82.0 0.9 2215.5 221.6 8.0 2.0 72.0 19.0 YELLOW 981.1 44.3 10.2 1.6 6.4
REED MARSH  Riverside 1/29/1999 10 71.9 82.0 0.9 2239.6 224.0 9.0 2.0 53.0 21.0 YELLOW 1055.9 47.1 11.4 1.7 6.6
REED MARSH  Riverside 2/17/1999 10 72.8 83.8 0.9 2285.4 228.5 7.5 2.5 67.0 22.0 PALE YEL. 1022.0 44.7 10.4 1.7 6.1
REED MARSH  Riverside 2/17/1999 10 74.0 85.9 0.9 2467.3 246.7 8.0 2.5 62.0 12.0 YELLOW  1166.7 47.3 11.1 1.7 6.6
REED MARSH Coachella 2/23/1999 10 95.0 107.2 0.9 4701.9 470.2 9.5 2.5 92.0 32.0 MED. YEL. 2018.9 42.9 8.5 1.3 6.8
REED MARSH Coachella 1/7/2000 10 88.9 97.8 0.9 3810.2 381.0 8.0 2.0 77.0 37.0 YELLOW 1860.8 48.8 8.8 1.4 6.5
REED MARSH Coachella 1/27/2000 10 91.0 98.8 0.9 3998.8 399.9 6.5 3.0 80.0 34.0 LT. YELLOW 1858.8 46.5 8.1 1.4 5.7
REED MARSH Coachella 2/23/2000 10 97.5 102.4 1.0 4367.7 436.8 7.0 2.5 91.0 33.0 YELLOW 1918.2 43.9 8.2 1.2 6.9

 


 

 


How to Support the Collection


Page created by: Center for Visual Computing
Maintained by: tsiebert@ucr.edu

UC Seal